Present levels
Describe current academic achievement and functional performance, including how disability-related needs affect involvement and progress in the general curriculum.
My Journey CurriculumStart a conversation Individualized planning in practice
A strong IEP is more than a document. It gives a team a shared picture of the learner, meaningful goals, the services and supports required, and a clear way to notice progress.
The connected parts
These elements summarize key federal IEP content requirements. State and local forms may organize them differently, and every decision must be individualized by the learner’s team.
Describe current academic achievement and functional performance, including how disability-related needs affect involvement and progress in the general curriculum.
Name observable academic and functional outcomes that address disability-related needs and support progress in the general curriculum and other educational priorities.
State how progress toward each annual goal will be measured and when progress reports will be provided.
Specify special education, related services, supplementary aids and services, program modifications, and supports for school personnel.
Explain any time the learner will not participate with nondisabled peers and connect placement decisions to the individualized IEP.
Identify individually appropriate assessment accommodations and document alternate-assessment decisions when applicable.
Make clear when services and modifications begin, how often they occur, where they are provided, and for how long.
Connect education to post-school goals and coordinated transition services on the applicable federal and state timeline.
The daily bridge
The curriculum creates places to practice IEP priorities. The IEP determines what is individualized for the learner.
Start with strengths, interests, family priorities, communication, culture, access, evaluation information, and current performance—not the disability label alone.
Identify where an IEP priority naturally connects to the lesson’s essential concept, authentic purpose, or participation demand.
Prepare needed AAC, assistive technology, visual supports, sensory or physical access, response options, staff support, and prompt-fading plan before teaching.
Keep the purpose visible. Use explicit modeling, supported practice, repetition, choice, and age-respectful materials.
Record what the learner did, the context, response mode, prompt level, accuracy, initiation, and whether the skill transferred.
Use the evidence to maintain, fade, generalize, reteach, revise access, or bring a concern back to the IEP team.
Learner voice
Give learners accessible ways to contribute: conversation, AAC, supported choice, photographs, objects, rating scales, demonstrations, portfolios, or trusted communication partners. Participation should be meaningful, not ceremonial.
Interests, relationships, routines, identity, culture, goals, worries, and the future the learner wants.
Communication modes, sensory and physical access, technology, pacing, people, environments, and recovery time.
Make learner contributions visible in goals, supports, materials, opportunities, and the evidence the team collects.
Questions worth asking
What can the learner already do, and under what conditions?
What does the learner communicate about their strengths, needs, preferences, and future?
Is the goal measurable without requiring a response mode that is not the target?
Are the services, supports, and staff responsibilities specific enough to implement consistently?
Can progress be observed across people, materials, and settings—not only on one worksheet?
What evidence will tell us that a support should be faded, maintained, changed, or expanded?
Plain-language reference
A quick reference for educators, families, and team members. Meanings and preferred terminology can vary by state, agency, and document, so use the learner’s current records and local guidance when a term affects a decision.
The documents and protections that shape individualized special education.
The federal special education law for eligible children and youth.
The written plan for a learner’s goals, services, supports, access, and progress measurement.
The family-centered plan used for eligible infants and toddlers receiving early-intervention services.
Special education and related services provided at public expense and in conformity with an IEP.
The requirement to educate learners with nondisabled peers to the maximum extent appropriate, with needed aids and supports.
A federal civil-rights protection that can provide equal access and accommodations for qualified learners with disabilities.
A federal civil-rights law prohibiting disability discrimination in covered settings.
The school’s written explanation of certain proposed or refused actions involving identification, evaluation, placement, or FAPE.
An evaluation completed by a qualified examiner who is not employed by the public agency responsible for the learner’s education.
Terms connected to participation, communication, materials, and individualized teaching.
Tools and strategies that supplement or replace speech, from gestures and boards to speech-generating devices.
A device or service used to increase, maintain, or improve a learner’s functional capabilities.
Materials designed or converted so learners can perceive, navigate, interact with, and respond to the content.
Adaptations to content, method, or delivery that address disability-related needs and provide access to the curriculum.
A framework for planning multiple ways to engage, access information, and demonstrate learning.
Aids, services, and other supports that help a learner learn with nondisabled peers and participate in school.
Individualized special education and related services provided beyond the normal school year when required for FAPE.
A technical standard used in producing accessible versions of print instructional materials.
Language teams use to understand needs, plan supports, and monitor outcomes.
The IEP’s current, evidence-based picture of what the learner can do, their needs, and the effect on access and progress.
A shorter or older term sometimes used for the learner’s current performance; current forms may use PLAAFP.
A process for understanding what may be contributing to a behavior and the context in which it occurs.
A proactive plan for teaching, preventing, and responding to behavior based on the learner’s needs and available evidence.
A required team review in certain disciplinary situations to consider the relationship between conduct and disability or IEP implementation.
A term commonly used in Arizona for the team that reviews evaluation information and eligibility.
An instructional or support practice backed by a body of relevant, credible evidence and applied with professional judgment.
Common professional roles that may contribute to evaluation, access, instruction, and IEP services.
Supports access and participation involving daily activities, motor skills, sensory needs, and environments.
Supports functional movement, positioning, mobility, and physical access in educational routines.
Evaluates and supports speech, language, communication, and related access needs.
A credentialed professional who may support behavior assessment, skill building, and team planning.
A specialist who supports access, instruction, and expanded core curriculum needs related to vision.
Instruction that supports safe, purposeful movement and navigation across environments.
Federal, state, and schoolwide terms—plus language that is especially useful in Arizona.
Arizona’s state education agency.
The ADE unit responsible for special education oversight, support, and technical assistance.
The Arizona term used for public agencies responsible for providing education; similar to LEA but broader in state use.
A public board or other authority legally responsible for public education in a local area.
The state-level education authority responsible for statewide administration and oversight.
The U.S. Department of Education office that administers IDEA programs and related guidance.
The federal office that enforces civil-rights laws in education, including disability protections.
The federal law governing access to and privacy of student education records.
A schoolwide framework for organizing academic, behavioral, and social-emotional supports at increasing levels of intensity.
A framework for building positive, predictable, and supportive learning environments.
A tiered approach that uses instruction and progress data to respond to learning needs; it cannot be used to delay a special education evaluation.
Abbreviations often seen in records and conversations. They describe eligibility or support areas—not the whole person.
A commonly used clinical and educational abbreviation; IDEA’s federal eligibility category is autism.
An IDEA eligibility category states may use for eligible young children within the state’s defined age range.
A commonly used umbrella term; records may use more specific IDEA eligibility language.
Terminology varies by state and system; IDEA regulations use emotional disturbance.
An IDEA eligibility category involving intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior with an educational impact.
An IDEA category for certain combined impairments that create needs not addressed by a program for one impairment alone.
An IDEA category for certain health-related conditions that affect strength, vitality, or alertness and educational performance.
An IDEA category involving certain disorders in psychological processes used to understand or use language.
An IDEA category for communication disorders that adversely affect educational performance.
An IDEA category for an acquired brain injury caused by external physical force with an educational impact.
An IDEA category for vision impairment that adversely affects educational performance, even with correction.
Need a term that is not listed? Use the federal IDEA acronym directory for a more comprehensive index, or Arizona’s education acronym guide for state-specific language.
Official foundations
This page is educational guidance, not legal advice or a substitute for state rules, district procedures, evaluation data, or an IEP team decision.
Continue the pathway
Explore practical ways to differentiate teaching, provide accommodations and supplementary supports, and think carefully about least restrictive environment.
Explore access & LRE